• Re: Epstein Files

    From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Rug Rat on Saturday, February 14, 2026 02:11:58
    Hi Rug,

    On 2026-02-13 17:40:18, you wrote to me:

    He probably wouldn't have lived as long as he did, if he was
    blackmailing on a large scale... ;-)

    Unless there was a tripwire built into the scheme. That the information is
    all immediately released upon death. Then your victims will want you to be
    kept alive as long as possible.

    Of course there was. But with a large number of victims, the chance that one of them didn't care to much about that, or does something stupid, would become quite high...


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.6-B20251227
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From paul lee@1:105/420 to Rug Rat on Friday, February 13, 2026 18:24:31
    So, I was thinking.. What if Jeffrey Epstein was originally a CIA operative and the entire plan from the begining was to use his island
    and "girls" as a large blackmail scheme to blackmain foreign heads of state and US businessmen and it spun out of control. Even more so now that DJT is the President. Let's speculate that nobody in their wildest dreams when the program was planned in stood up ever considered that a scenario.

    I think we're gonna continue to find out a lot more up this alley - I don't think yer far off.



    |07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
    |08.........

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: 2o fOr beeRS bbS>>20ForBeers.com:1337 (1:105/420)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to RUG RAT on Saturday, February 14, 2026 10:39:02
    Don't know about the CIA but there are other conspiracies that suggest he was being backed by a foreign "state actor."

    Then why all the subterfuge with the hesitency to release them, on our side?

    The lies of,

    "They are on my desk..."

    Later...

    "There are no files..."

    Because people are in them that they don't want to expose.

    Well, you have painted yourself into a corner, either they are on your desk or
    the never existed. You have painted yourself into a corner as you were lying then or you are lying now.. Which is it?

    They are always lying when it comes to this topic.

    I think Trump stupidly made a compange promis before realizing or knowing that
    by doing so it would bring down powerful people in his own party. I think those powerful people were betting that either the paper/digital trial was lon
    gone, Trump would be distracted by other things on his agenda, or others in th
    loop would still play ball and not release the documents for fear bredth of th
    polical fallout. They lost the bet, the gennie was now out of the bottle and everyone was in a full panic trying to figure out how to get it back in the bottle!

    Cannot disagree here.

    My "conspiratal" concerns with all of this is that they are currently posting the files so that, in future, anyone named can claim they cannot receive a fair trial because all the details of any potential offenses have
    already been exposed publicly.

    The has never stopped the wheel of justice from moving forward to arrests and trial for the commoon folk in the past, even when the media is the one tried and convicted the suspect before it even went to court, IE the security guard at the Atlanta Olympics.

    The evidence is out there, the public demanded it. IF there are any charges brought forth, it is up the lawyers on both sides to put it into context.

    Yes but I don't think this much has been let out of the bag before someone
    got in, and stayed in, trouble.


    * SLMR 2.1a * I wish Noah had swatted those two mosquitoes.....
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to MIKE POWELL on Sunday, February 15, 2026 08:03:13
    So, my guess is that because the files are released publically there will ver
    >likely never be any convictions or even indictments that come out of them.
    >If there are any, it will only be for the most heanous crimes, against dead
    >persons who cannot defend themselves, or against small-time players who
    >cannot afford to properly defend themselves. :(

    That would be true from the eMails but couldn't those underage women
    go after the offenders themselves? Emails wouldn't make a case on
    their own but might support what these ladies say..

    That said, I can't help but wonder how many of those 'exploited'
    under-age girls were there totally voluntarily and quite thrilled
    about it at the time but now want to make a big fuss over it for
    publicity and/or money.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Young at heart...slightly older in other places
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ROB MCCART on Sunday, February 15, 2026 10:21:44
    So, my guess is that because the files are released publically there will ver
    >likely never be any convictions or even indictments that come out of them.
    >If there are any, it will only be for the most heanous crimes, against dead
    >persons who cannot defend themselves, or against small-time players who
    >cannot afford to properly defend themselves. :(

    That would be true from the eMails but couldn't those underage women
    go after the offenders themselves? Emails wouldn't make a case on
    their own but might support what these ladies say..

    They could. Sounds like they tried to take the criminal route themselves, going as far back as the late 1990s (??), but the FBI at the time sort of ignored them and/or thought they didn't have enough to make a case.

    They may luck out in other countries, or in the individual states, provided that any state that legally could do so didn't have a statute of
    limitations that has already run out.

    They may need to try the civil route to get anything done on their own.

    That said, I can't help but wonder how many of those 'exploited'
    under-age girls were there totally voluntarily and quite thrilled
    about it at the time but now want to make a big fuss over it for
    publicity and/or money.

    The issue here would be, as under-aged persons, they were not old enough to make those decisions on their own which would put the responsibility on the adults that were exploiting them.

    Mike

    * SLMR 2.1a * Stick em up! <BANG> Okay.... DON'T stick em' up!
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to MIKE POWELL on Tuesday, February 17, 2026 08:05:20
    They may luck out in other countries, or in the individual states, provided
    >that any state that legally could do so didn't have a statute of
    >limitations that has already run out.

    They may need to try the civil route to get anything done on their own.

    Yes, often after a few years that's the only option left.

    That said, I can't help but wonder how many of those 'exploited'
    >> under-age girls were there totally voluntarily and quite thrilled
    >> about it at the time but now want to make a big fuss over it for
    >> publicity and/or money.

    The issue here would be, as under-aged persons, they were not old enough to
    >make those decisions on their own which would put the responsibility on the
    >adults that were exploiting them.

    Yes, I know it's a mess. It's hard to say that a person who is 17 years
    old is too young to know what they are doing but that's what the law says.
    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Correct me if i'm wrong... everybody else does
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)